The role of coach-athlete relationship on motivation and sports engagement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0503

Keywords:

engagement, motivation, coach-athlete relationship, intrinsic, extrinsic

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The relationship between coach and athlete may significantly influence an athlete's experience in sports. Elements such as closeness, commitment, and complementarity are key aspects of this relationship. The current study aimed to examine the association between motivation and athletes' engagement in sports, as mediated by the coach-athlete relationship. Material and Methods. A sample of 408 student-athletes from various universities in Iligan City participated in the study. They completed a set of questionnaires assessing motivation, the coach-athlete relationship, and athlete engagement. The participants were between 18 and 25 years old. The measures used in the study included the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CARTQ), the Sports Motivation Scale (SMS), and the Athletic Engagement Questionnaire (AEQ). Ethical approval was obtained from all participants. Results. The results showed that coach-athlete relationships were characterized by closeness, commitment, and complementarity. These relationships significantly mediated the link between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and athlete engagement in sports. Strong connections between coaches and athletes enhance the positive effect of motivation on engagement. This occurs by fulfilling athletes' psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Conversely, amotivation was negatively associated with engagement through the dimensions of the coach-athlete relationship. Athletes with high levels of amotivation are more likely to disengage. This highlights the need for coaches to foster a supportive environment that reduces negative motivational states. Conclusions. The evidence supports the utilization of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to better understand the importance of relationship factors in enhancing motivation. This approach leads to long-term engagement in sports. These results offer a more comprehensive view of the delicate dynamics of the coach-athlete relationship and its consequences for motivation and athletic engagement in sports.

Author Biographies

Jet Longakit, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology

Jet.longakit@g.msuiit.edu.ph; College of Education, Department of Physical Education; Iligan City, Philippines.

Lyndie Toring-Aque, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology

lyndie.toring@g.msuiit.edu.ph; College of Education, Department of Physical Education; Iligan City, Philippines.

Felix Aque Jr., Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology

felix.aquejr@g.msuiit.edu.ph; College of Education, Department of Physical Education; Iligan City, Philippines.

Minerva Sayson, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology

minerva.sayson@g.msuiit.edu.ph; College of Education, Department of Physical Education; Iligan City, Philippines.

Joseph Lobo, Bulacan State University

joseph.lobo@bulsu.edu.ph; College of Sports, Exercise and Recreation; Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippines.

References

De Francisco C, Sánchez-Romero EI, Vílchez Conesa MDP, Arce C. Basic Psychological Needs, Burnout and Engagement in Sport: The Mediating Role of Motivation Regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020;17(14):4941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144941

De Francisco C, Arce C, Sánchez-Romero EI. The mediating role of sport self-motivation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and athlete engagement. Psicothema, 2018;(30.4): 421–426. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.117

Podlog L, Gustafsson H, Skoog T, Gao Z, Westin M, Werner S, et al. Need satisfaction, motivation, and engagement among high-performance youth athletes: A multiple mediation analysis. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2015;13(4):415–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2014.999346

Hodge K, Lonsdale C, Jackson SA. Athlete Engagement in Elite Sport: An Exploratory Investigation of Antecedents and Consequences. The Sport Psychologist, 2009;23(2):186–202. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.23.2.186

Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Raedeke T. Athlete engagement: A qualitative investigation of relevance and dimensions. Int J Sport Psychol, 2007;38:451–70.

Graña M, De Francisco C, Arce C. The Relationship between Motivation and Burnout in Athletes and the Mediating Role of Engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021;18(9):4884. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094884

Gu S, Xue L. Relationships among Sports Group Cohesion, Psychological Collectivism, Mental Toughness and Athlete Engagement in Chinese Team Sports Athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022;19(9):4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094987

Núñez-Barriopedro E, Cuesta-Valiño P, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez P, Ravina-Ripoll R. How Does Happiness Influence the Loyalty of Karate Athletes? A Model of Structural Equations From the Constructs: Consumer Satisfaction, Engagement, and Meaningful. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021;12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653034

Schmidt V, Corti JF, Celsi I, Raimundi MJ, Castillo I. Enjoyment in Sport and Alcohol Use among Adolescents: Examining the Mediating Role of Engagement. Children, 2024;11(8):977. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11080977

Scotto di Luzio S, Martinent G, Guillet-Descas E, Daigle MP. Exploring the Role of Sport Sense of Community in Perceived Athlete Burnout, Sport Motivation, and Engagement. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2019;32(5):513–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2019.1575298

Fawver B, Cowan RL, DeCouto B, Lohse KR, Podlog L, Williams AM. Psychological characteristics, sport engagement, and performance in alpine skiers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2019;47:101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101616

Guo Z, Yang J, Wu M, Xu Y, Chen S, Li S. The associations among athlete gratitude, athlete engagement, athlete burnout: A cross-lagged study in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022;13: 996144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996144

Kim M, Oja BD, Kim HS, Chin JH. Developing Student-Athlete School Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being: The Effects of Academic Psychological Capital and Engagement. Journal of Sport Management, 2020;34(4):378–90. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2020-0091

McGee V, DeFreese JD. The Coach-Athlete Relationship and Athlete Psychological Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 2019;13(1):152–74. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2018-0010

Chen Y, Liu S. The Relationship between Coaches’ Independent Support Behavior, Psychological Tenacity, and Athlete Engagement. Scholars Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 2024;12(06):192–4. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjahss.2024.v12i06.002

Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000;11(4):227–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci EL, Ryan RM, Gagné M, Leone DR, Usunov J, Kornazheva BP. Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001;27(8):930–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002

Chua J, Ayoko OB. Employees’ Self-Determined Motivation, Transformational Leadership and Work Engagement. Journal of Management & Organization, 2019;27(3):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.74

Kim M, Kim YD, Lee HW. It is Time to Consider Athletes’ Well-Being and Performance Satisfaction: The Roles of Authentic Leadership and Psychological Capital. Sport Management Review, 2020;23(5):964–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.12.008

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 2000;55(1):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Howard JL, Bureau J, Guay F, Chong JXY, Ryan RM. Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021;16(6):1300–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

Deci EL, Ryan RM. Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships: Relationships Motivation Theory. Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships, 2014;53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_3

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2020;61(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Curran T, Hill AP, Hall HK, Jowett GE. Relationships between the Coach-Created Motivational Climate and Athlete Engagement in Youth Sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2015;37(2):193–8. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0203

De Muynck GJ, Vansteenkiste M, Delrue J, Aelterman N, Haerens L, Soenens B. The Effects of Feedback Valence and Style on Need Satisfaction, Self-Talk, and Perseverance Among Tennis Players: An Experimental Study. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2017;39(1):67–80. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0326

Vink K, Raudsepp L. Perfectionistic Strivings, Motivation and Engagement in Among Sport-Specific Activities Adolescent Team Athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2018;125(3):003151251876583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512518765833

Morales-Sánchez V, Crespillo-Jurado M, Jiménez-López D, Morillo-Baro JP, Hernández-Mendo A, Reigal RE. Relationships between Controlling Interpersonal Coaching Style, Basic Psychological Need Thwarting, and Burnout, in Adolescent Soccer Players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020;17(13):4909. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134909

Morano M, Bortoli L, Ruiz MC, Robazza C. Psychobiosocial States as Mediators of the Effects of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction on Burnout Symptoms in Youth Sport. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020;17(12):4447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124447

Morbée S, Vansteenkiste M, Aelterman N, Haerens L. Why Do Sport Coaches Adopt a Controlling Coaching Style? The Role of an Evaluative Context and Psychological Need Frustration. The Sport Psychologist, 2020;34(2):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2018-0197

Fenton SAM, Duda JL, Barrett T. Optimising physical activity engagement during youth sport: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2016;34(19):1874–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1142104

Ullrich-French S, Ramón J, Hidalgo D. Validity evidence for the adaptation of the State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity (SMS-PA) in Spanish youth. Psicothema, 2017;29(1):119–25. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.204

Jowett S, Ntoumanis N. The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2004;14(4):245–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x

Woolliams D, Spencer K, Walters S, Krägeloh C. Resolving uncertainties of the factor structures of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q). Australian Journal of Psychology, 2021;73(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1882275

Simons EE, Bird MD. Coach-athlete relationship, social support, and sport-related psychological well-being in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I student-athletes. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 2022;17(3):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2022.2060703

Jowett S, Shanmugam V, Caccoulis S. Collective efficacy as a mediator of the association between interpersonal relationships and athlete satisfaction in team sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2012;10(1):66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2012.645127

Jin H, Kim S, Love A, Jin Y, Zhao J. Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022;13(1): 1012953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953

Choi H, Jeong Y, Kim SK. The Relationship between Coaching Behavior and Athlete Burnout: Mediating Effects of Communication and the Coach–Athlete Relationship. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020;17(22):8618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228618

Adie JW, Jowett S. Meta-Perceptions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship, Achievement Goals, and Intrinsic Motivation Among Sport Participants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2010;40(11):2750–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00679.x

Jowett S, Cramer D. The Prediction of Young Athletes’ Physical Self from Perceptions of Relationships with Parents and Coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2010;11(2):140–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.001

Jowett S. Validating Coach-Athlete Relationship Measures with the Nomological Network. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2009;13(1):34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670802609136

Wachsmuth S, Jowett S, Harwood CG. Third party interventions in coach-athlete conflict: Can sport psychology practitioners offer the necessary support? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2020;34(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2020.1723737

Davis L, Jowett S, Tafvelin S. Communication strategies: The fuel for quality coach-athlete relationships and athlete satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019;10(1): 2156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02156

Jowett S, Nezlek J. Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2011;29(3):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511420980

Felton L, Jowett S. “What do coaches do” and “how do they relate”: Their effects on athletes’ psychological needs and functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2012;23(2):130–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12029

Haerens L, Vansteenkiste M, De Meester A, Delrue J, Tallir I, Vande Broek G, et al. Different combinations of perceived autonomy support and control: Identifying the most optimal motivating style. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2017;23(1):16–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1346070

Wang J, Tong W. Effect of the coach–athlete relationship on engagement among Chinese athletes: Life satisfaction as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2024;52(6):1–8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.13189

Yang SX, Jowett S. The psychometric properties of the short and long versions of the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2013;17(4):281–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2013.831763

López de Subijana C, Martin LJ, Ramos J, Côté J. How coach leadership is related to the coach-athlete relationship in elite sport. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2021;16(6):1239–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541211021523

Pelletier LG, Rocchi MA, Vallerand RJ, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2013;14(3):329–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.002

DeFreese JD, Smith AL. Athlete social support, negative social interactions, and psychological health across a competitive sport season. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2014;36(6):619–30. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0040

Smohai M, Szemes Á, Bernhardt-Torma N, Mirnics Z, Bóna K, Kovács K, et al. Psychometric properties of the Hungarian adaptation of the Sport Motivation Scale II. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2021;21(3):2209–18. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s3281

Komarc M, Harbichová I, Scheier LM. Psychometric validation of Czech version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Blanch A (ed.) PLOS ONE, 2020;15(1): e0227277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227277

Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Jackson SA. Athlete Engagement Questionnaire. PsycTESTS Dataset, 2007; https://doi.org/10.1037/t50268-000

Martins P, Rosado A, Ferreira V, Biscaia R. Examining the validity of the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire (AEQ) in a Portuguese sport setting. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 2014;20(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-65742014000100001

Gu S, Peng W, Du F, Fang X, Guan Z, He X, et al. Association between coach-athlete relationship and athlete engagement in Chinese team sports: The mediating effect of thriving. Namaziandost E (ed.) PLOS ONE, 2023;18(8): e0289979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289979

Hayes AF. Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. [Internet]. 2012. [updated 2023 Sep; cited 2024 Jun 28]. Available from: http://www.afhayes.com/-public/process2012.pdf

Jordalen G, Lemyre PN, Solstad BE, Ivarsson A. The Role of Self-Control and Motivation on Exhaustion in Youth Athletes: A Longitudinal Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018;9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02449

Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer US, 1985; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Di Domenico SI, Ryan RM. The Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017;11(145). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145

Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2014;140(4):980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661

Gillet N, Vallerand RJ. Effects of motivation on sport performance based on self-determination theory: Towards a person-centered approach. Psychologie Française, 2016;61(4):257–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2014.01.001

Augustyniak RA, Ables AZ, Guilford P, Lujan HL, Cortright RN, DiCarlo SE. Intrinsic motivation: An overlooked component for student success. Advances in Physiology Education, 2016;40(4):465–6. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00072.2016

Readdy T, Raabe J, Harding JS. Student-Athletes’ Perceptions of an Extrinsic Reward Program: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Self-Determination Theory in the Context of College Football. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2014;26(2):157–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2013.816801

Almagro BJ, Sáenz-López P, Fierro-Suero S, Conde C. Perceived Performance, Intrinsic Motivation and Adherence in Athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020;17(24):9441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249441

Reynders B, Vansteenkiste M, Van Puyenbroeck S, Aelterman N, De Backer M, Delrue J, et al. Coaching the coach: Intervention effects on need-supportive coaching behavior and athlete motivation and engagement. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2019;43(1):288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.04.002

Kouali D, Hall C, Divine A, Pope JP. Motivation and Eudaimonic Well-Being in Athletes: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2021;93(3):457–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1864259

Calvo TG, Cervelló E, Jiménez R, Iglesias D, Murcia JAM. Using Self-Determination Theory to Explain Sport Persistence and Dropout in Adolescent Athletes. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2010;13(2):677–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600002341

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

1.
Longakit J, Toring-Aque L, Aque Jr. F, Sayson M, Lobo J. The role of coach-athlete relationship on motivation and sports engagement . Physical Education of Students. 2024;28(5):268-7. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0503
Statistics

Abstract views: 6546 / PDF downloads: 3394