Interrelations of physical state parameters and biological age of students in the process of physical education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0102

Keywords:

students, biological age, interrelations, functional state, physical fitness, models

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The objective of the study is to investigate the relationships of students' biological age (BA) with the parameters of functional and physical fitness (PF) in the process of adaptation to standard (university) and experimental physical education programs. Material and  Methods. The studies were conducted at the National University of Telecommunications of Ukraine and involved 140 students aged 17-18 years old, comprising 80 boys and 60 girls. We recorded 55 indices of students' functional state and physical fitness, and determined their Body Mass Index (BMI). The experimental data were processed using methods of correlation, dispersion, and regression analysis. Mathematical models describing the relationships between BMI and key indicators of students' physical well-being were developed. Results.  The impact of the program on 17-18-year-old students is marked by a decrease in BMI, an increase in the levels of physical fitness and overall well-being among both the experimental group of girls and boys. Additionally, there is a reduced correlation between BMI and the parameters of their physical health. The key indices of functional state and physical fitness determining the BMI of male and female students were identified. Multiple regression models were developed to illustrate the dependence of male and female BMI on somatic and functional indices. Quantitative characteristics of the degree of partial and total impact of key indices on male and female BMI were provided. It was found that the key indicators of students' physical state (PS) structure, which exerted the most significant influence on BMI, differ between young men and women. In young men, the key indicators influencing BMI include the following: Vital capacity (VC) accounts for 51.9% of BMI variation; self-perceived health status (SPHS) contributes 15.3%; static balancing (SB) affects 8.5%; inspiration breath-hold time (IBH) influences 8.4%; expiration breath-hold time (EBH) has a 0.8% impact; systolic blood pressure (SBP) plays a role with 4.6%; the number of sit-ups in 30 seconds (SU30s) is associated with 0.9%; and left hand muscle strength has a 0.6% influence.  In girls, the key indicators are VC (34.5% of BMI variation), SBP (23.1%), and SB (7.9%). Conclusions. The experimental program of increased motor activity leads to an increase in the functional and motor capabilities of students, while simultaneously decreasing their BMI. Among the parameters studied, changes in vegetative parameters have the greatest impact on reducing students' BMI during the annual cycle of long-term adaptation to physical loads. In contrast, changes in somatic parameters and physical fitness parameters have a lesser influence on students' BMI. The calculated equations of multiple regression serve as model characteristics that reflect the relationships between BMI and the key indicators of functional state and physical fitness in 17-18-year-old students. These equations can be utilized to estimate, model, and predict the BMI of 17-18-year-old students of different genders when altering the parameters of their physical state in various conditions of daily life and activity.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Pryimakov, University of Szczecin

sanaol7.alex@gmail.com; Institute of Physical Culture Sciences; Szczecin, Poland.

Marek Sawczuk, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport

Marek.Sawczuk@usz.edu.pl; Department of Physical Education (Gdansk, Poland); Institute of Physical Culture Sciences, Szczecin University (Szczecin, Poland).

Stanislav Prysiazhniuk, NDUU The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

stas046@ukr.net; Kyiv, Ukraine.

Nataliya Mazurok, University of Szczecin

natprim75@gmail.com; Center for Human Structural and Functional Research; Szczecin, Poland. 

Oleksandr Petrachkov, The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

apetrachkov77@ukr.net; Kyiv, Ukraine.

References

Sirotin AB, Belozerova LM, Shchepina GM. Motor activity impact on aging of middle-aged men. Remedial Gymnastics and Sports Medicine, 2009;6:21–24.

Kang YG, Suh E, Lee JW, Kim DW, Cho KH, Bae CY. Biological age as a health index for mortality and major age-related disease incidence in Koreans: National Health Insurance Service - Health screening 11-year follow-up study. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:429-436. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S157014

Prysiazhniuk S, Tolubko V, Oleniev D, Parczevskyy Y, Prontenko K, Griban G, Zhyrnov O. The influence of physical activities on biological age parameters of the first-year female students from the special medical department. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2018;18(2):561-564. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.02081

Belozerova LM. Method of determining biological age according to work capacity. Clinical Gerontology, 1998;2:34-38. [In Russian].

Chainikov PN, Cherkasova VG. Biological age and age changes rate in athletes of playing kinds of sport and untrained persons. Perm Medical Journal. 2017;34(1):95-99. https://doi.org/10.17816/pmj34195-99

Pryimakov O, Sawczuk M, Tymoshenko O, Mazurok N. Model characteristics of the structure and interrelations of integral parameters of students’ physical condition. Physical Education of Students, 2023;27(5):279–293. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0508

Prysiazhniuk S, Pryimakov O, Iermakov S, Oleniev D, Eider J, Mazurok N. Influence of weekly physical exercises on indicators of biological age of student’s youth. Physical Education of Students, 2021;25(1):58-66. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2021.0108.

Kolokoltsev M, Romanova E, Vorozheikin A, Bocharin I, Karuzin K, Martusevich A, Prikhodov D, Aganov S. The effect of physical activity on biological age and body composition in 18–19-year-old girls. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2022;22(4):981–987. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.04125

Kutakova NS, Shushkova TS, Yudina TV. Methodology of assessing the pace of biological aging in hygienic research (literature review). Vestnik RGMU, 2013;5:59-63.

Razmahova SY, Timofeeva OV, Epp TI. Assessment of the biological age of full-time and part-time students. Tomsk State University Journal. 2023;(486): 221–227. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/486/24

Tzemah-Shahar R, Hochner H, Iktilat K, Agmon M. What can we learn from physical capacity about biological age? A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews. 2022;77: 101609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101609

Sinkovic F, Novak D, Foretic N, Zemkova E. The Effects of Biological Age on Speed-Explosive Properties in Young Tennis Players. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 2023;8(2): 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020048

Gallo LA, Gallo TF, Young SL, Moritz KM, Akison LK. The Impact of Isolation Measures Due to COVID-19 on Energy Intake and Physical Activity Levels in Australian University Students. Nutrients, 2020;12(6):1865-1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061865

Parsons N, Griffin XL, Achten J, Chesser TJ, Lamb SE, Costa ML. Modelling and estimation of health-related quality of life after hip fracture: A re-analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0199

Rebelo-Marques A, De Sousa Lages A, Andrade R, Ribeiro CF, Mota-Pinto A, Carrilho F and Espregueira-Mendes J Aging Hallmarks: The Benefits of Physical Exercise. Front. Endocrinol. 2018;9:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00258

Pavanello, Campisi, Tona, Lin, Iliceto (2019). Exploring epigenetic age in response to intensive relaxing training: a pilot study to slow down biological age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019;16(17): 3074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173074

Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, et al. Leisure Time Physical Activity of Moderate to Vigorous Intensity and Mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335

Garatachea N, Pareja-Galeano H, Sanchis-Gomar F, Santos-Lozano A, Fiuza-Luces C, Morán M, et al. Exercise Attenuates the Major Hallmarks of Aging. Rejuvenation Research. 2015;18(1): 57–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2014.1623

Zhong X, Lu Y, Gao Q, Nyunt MSZ, Fulop T, Monterola CP, et al. Estimating Biological Age in the Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2020;75(10):1913-1920. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz146

Sindeeva LB, Nikolaev VG, Kochetova TF, Kovrigina OA. Component composition of the body as a criteria of biological age. Siberian Medical Review. 2015;5:61-65. https://doi.org/10.20333/25000136-2015-5-61-66

Prinzinger R. Programmed ageing: the theory of maximal metabolic scope. European Molecular Biology Organization, 2005;6:14-19. https://doi.org/10.20333/25000136-2015-5-61-66

Munoz-Espin D, Serrano M. Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology. Molecular Cell Biology, 2014;15:482-496. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400425

Belsky DW, Moffitt TE, Cohen AA, Corcoran DL, Levine ME, Prinz JA, et al. Eleven Telomere, Epigenetic Clock, and Biomarker-Composite Quantifications of Biological Aging: Do They Measure the Same Thing? American Journal of Epidemiology. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx346

Borovikov VP. A popular introduction to modern data analysis in STATISTICA. Methodology and technology of modern data analysis. Moscow: Goryachaya Liniya-Telecom; 2018.

Voitenko VP. Health of the healthy. Introduction to Sanology. Kyiv: Health; 1991. [In Russian].

Rahman SA, Adjeroh DA. Estimating Biological Age from Physical Activity using Deep Learning with 3D CNN. In: Yoo IH, Bi JB, Hu X, editors. Ieee International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine–BIBM, 2019:1100–1103. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM47256.2019.8983251

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 2013;310:2191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Golyaka SK, Glukhov IG. Physiological bases of physical culture and sports. Kherson: Vyshemyrskyi VS, 2019. (In Ukrainian).

Sereda I, Lavrin H, Kucher T, Grygus I, Napierała M, Muszkieta R, et al. Effect of yoga exercises on the senior schoolchildren’s biological age during physical education. J Phys Educ Sport. 2021;21(5):2782–2789. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s5370

Ajman H, Tomac Z. Differences in biological age of the best U11 and U13 teams in Croatia. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2019;14:2375-2379. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc5.52

Goto H, Morris JG, Nevill ME. Influence of biological maturity on the match performance of 8-to 16-year-old, elite, male, youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(11):3078-3084. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002510

Sudakov KV. Informational features of functional systems: theoretical aspects. RAMS Herald. 1997;12:3-21.

Dao Chanh Thuc. The influence of physical activities on biological age parameters of females from 17 to 18 years old. J Sports Med Ther. 2018;3:75-79. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jsmt.1001030

Bacil E, Mazzardo Junior O, Rech C, Legnani R, Campos W. Physical activity and biological maturation: a systematic review. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2015;33(1):114–121. [In Portuguese]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2014.11.003

Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, Cohen HJ, Corcoran DL, Danese A, Harrington H, Israel S, Levine ME, Schaefer JD, Sugden K, Williams B, Yashin AI, Poulton R, Moffitt TE. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(E4):104–110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506264112

Gumenyuk S, Sereda I, Hulka O, Lavrin H, Ladyka P, Kuz Y. Effect of yoga on biological age indicators of 14-15-year-old girls. J Phys Educ Sport. 2021;21(5):2956-2962. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s5392

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

1.
Pryimakov O, Sawczuk M, Prysiazhniuk S, Mazurok N, Petrachkov O. Interrelations of physical state parameters and biological age of students in the process of physical education. Physical Education of Students. 2024;28(1):16-28. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0102
Statistics

Abstract views: 1474 / PDF downloads: 703

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>