The effectiveness of students’ preparation in physical training at the universities of various departments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2020.0101

Keywords:

cadets, students, physical preparation, functional condition, physical health

Abstract

Purpose. To make a comparative analysis and evaluate the effectiveness of physical exercises in a technical university and departmental university of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Material and methods. The study involved male students (1 functional group of health) of the Irkutsk National Research Technical University (Russia, n = 1380) and cadets of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (Russia, n = 762). Cadets studied at 1, 2 and 3 courses. The characteristics of physical preparation and the functional condition of students and cadets were analyzed. Results. During the training period, most indicators of cadets' physical preparation significantly exceed their values ​​in students. This is due to the preliminary selection of candidates for training in educational institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. It is also associated with a expressed training orientation of the process of physical preparation. The dynamics of the values of the indicators of the functional condition of the body of cadets is characterized by a high price of adaptation to physical activity. This can lead to the occurrence of pre-pathological conditions and pathological processes of the cardiovascular system. Conclusions. The dynamics of the values of indicators of physical preparation of students and cadets cannot be the only objective criterion for the effectiveness of the system of their physical education. For its full assessment, it is necessary to analyze the parameters of the functional condition of the body, characterizing the reaction to physical activity. Cadets have a great adaptation to physical activity. In this case, it cannot be concluded that the physical training of cadets is more effective.

Author Biographies

Anvar A. Akhmatgatin, Irkutsk National Research Technical University

ahmatgatin@list.ru; Department of Physical Culture; Irkutsk, Russia.

Vladislav Y. Lebedinsky, Irkutsk National Research Technical University

lebedinskiy@istu.ru; Department of Physical Culture; Irkutsk, Russia.

Gennady K. Khomyakov, Irkutsk National Research Technical University

girya-irk60@yandex.ru; Department of Physical Culture; Irkutsk, Russia.

Mikhail D. Kudryavtsev, Siberian Federal University

 kumid@yandex.ru; Department of Physical Culture; Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Alena G. Galimova, East – Siberian Institute of the Ministry of internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

89027602726@mail.ru; Department of Physical Training; Irkutsk, Russia.

Tatyana L. Kamoza, Siberian Federal University

tat.kamoza@yandex.ru; Department of Physical Culture; Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Evgeniy V. Panov, The Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affair of Russia

pan_69@mail.ru; Department of Physical Training; Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Vladimir A. Kuzmin, Siberian Federal University

atosn35@mail.ru; Department of Physical Culture; Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Alexey V. Gaskov, Buryat State University

gaskov@bsu.ru; Department of Theory of Physical Culture; Ulan-Ude, Russia.

Leonid K. Sidorov, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University of V.P. Astafyev

sidorovk@kspu.ru; Department of Theoretical Foundations of Physical Education; Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Sergey A. Doroshenko, Siberian Federal University

trisha246@yandex.ru; Department of Physical Culture; Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

References

1. Black P, Wiliam D. Developing the Theory of Formative Assesement. Educational Assesement, Evaluation and Accountability, 2009;21:5-31.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

2. López-Pastor VM, Kirk D, Lorente-Catalán E, MacPhail A, Macdonald D. Alternative assessment in physical education: a review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 2013;18:57–76.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860

3. Thompson D, Penney D. Assessment Literacy in Primary Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 2015;21(4):485- 503.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15584087

4. Tolgfors B. Different versions of assessment for learning in the subject of physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2018; 23(3): 311-327.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1429589

5. Borghouts LB, Slingerland M, Haerens L. Assessment Quality and Practices in Secondary PE in the Netherlands. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2016; 22(5): 473-489.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1241226

6. Akhmatgatin AA, Struganov SM. The characteristics of technical university students physical preparation. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2017; 5:15-21. (in Russian)

7. Leirhaug PE, MacPhail A. It's the other assessment that is the key’: three Norwegian physical education teachers' engagement (or not) with assessment for learning. Sport, Education and Society, 2015; 20(5): 624-640,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.975113

8. Lebedinskij VIu. The assessment of the physical health of children and teenagers in Irkutsk. Irkutsk: IrSTU Publ.; 2004. (in Russian)

9. Epifanova MG. Monitoring of girl students’ physical condition and physical fitness. Irkutsk: IrSTU Publ.; 2014. (in Russian)

10. Ignat’eva EP. Physical condition and physical fitness of third functional health group’s students. Irkutsk: IrSTU Publ.; 2014. (in Russian)

11. Izaak SI. Monitoring of physical condition and physical fitness. Moscow: Soviet sport; 2005. (in Russian)

12. Khomiakov GK. Index of efficiency of blood circulation as a method of control for optimization of physical load. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta, 2017; 5 (147): 182-184. (in Russian)

13. Komkov AG. Social-pedagogic monitoring of physical activity, health and cultural development indicators. Teoriia i praktika fizicheskoj kul’tury, 1998;6:2–7. (in Russian)

14. Landa BKh. Methodic of physical condition and physical fitness complex assessment. Kazan; 2000. (in Russian)

15. Lebedinskiy VY. Monitoring of HEE educational processes’ subjects health “Health Passport”. Irkutsk: IrSTU Publ.; 2008. (in Russian)

16. Lebedinskiy VY. Monitoring of physical health as factor of physical education’s pedagogic orientation strengthening in non profile HEEs. Teoriia i praktika fizicheskoj kul’tury, 2014;10:98–101. (in Russian)

17. Hastie PA, Wellhead T. Models-Based Practice in Physical Education: The Case for Sport Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2016;35(4):390- 399.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0092

18. MacLean J, Mulholland R, Gray S, Horrell A. Enabling curriculum change in physical education: the interplay between policy constructors and practitioners. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2015;20(1):79- 96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2013.798406

19. Basar MJ, Stanek JM, Dodd DD, Begalle RL. The Influence of Corrective Exercises on Functional Movement Screen and Physical Fitness Performance in Army ROTC Cadets. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2019;28(4):360-367.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0086

20. Borges JH, Hunter GR, Silva AM, Cirolini VX, Langer RD, Pascoa MA, et al. Adaptive thermogenesis and changes in body composition and physical fitness in army cadets. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2019;59(1):94-101.
https://doi.org/10.23736/s0022-4707.17.08066-5

21. Kukic F, Jeknic V, Dawes J, Orr R, Stojkovic M, Cvorovic A. Effects of training and a semester break on physical fitness of police trainees. Kinesiology. 2019;51(2):161-169.
https://doi.org/10.26582/k.51.2.2

22. Orr RM, Dawes JJ, Pope R, Terry J. Assessing differences in anthropometric and fitness characteristics between police academy cadets and incumbent officers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018;32(9):2632-2641.
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002328

23. Vantarakis A, Chatzinikolaou A, Avloniti A, Vezos N, Douroudos, II, Draganidis D, et al. A 2-month linear periodized resistance exercise training improved musculoskeletal fitness and specific conditioning of navy cadets. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017;31(5):1362-1370.
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001599

Downloads

Published

2020-02-04

How to Cite

1.
Akhmatgatin AA, Lebedinsky VY, Khomyakov GK, Kudryavtsev MD, Galimova AG, Kamoza TL, Panov EV, Kuzmin VA, Gaskov AV, Sidorov LK, Doroshenko SA. The effectiveness of students’ preparation in physical training at the universities of various departments. Physical Education of Students. 2020;24(1):4-10. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2020.0101
Statistics

Abstract views: 711 / PDF downloads: 499

Most read articles by the same author(s)